INTEL CORE I3 VS I5 1080P WITH THE

Taking the Core i5 example, your computer could have any of the following, and many beyond that as well: Core i5-7400, Core i5 7600K, Core i5 7300U, Core i5-7500HQ, Core i5-7400T and Core i5 7Y57. The differences among Intels key processor families are clearer when youre looking at the Core i3 (found mainly in budget systems) or the Core i9. Intel Core Lineup OverviewIntel Core i5 vs. Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-10110U and Intel Core i5-6500TE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.Having recently provided a similar overview for AMD's 3rd-gen Ryzen range, it was only logical we did the same for Intel, considering the 10th-gen CPUs have only been out for a few months. Intel Core i3-10110U vs Intel Core i5-6500TE.

The locked model receives a 65-watt TDP rating and the unlocked part a 125-watt TDP. The Core i7-10700 is the locked part, it runs at a 2.9 GHz base clock with a max turbo of 4.8 GHz, whereas the 10700K is unlocked and out of the box runs at 3.8 GHz for the base and 5.1 GHz for the boost. The 10600K and its F variant are fully unlocked, provided you’re using a Z-series motherboard, they can be overclocked.The Core i7 range is somewhat simplified, there are two distinct 8-core/16-thread models. The non-K models are rated with a 65-watt TDP while the unlocked K SKUs pack a 125-watt TDP.The difference between the 10400, 1050 is 200 to 300 MHz, that’s it, and since they’re locked parts you won’t be able to change that. The six models feature 6 cores, 12 threads and a 12MB L3 cache.

It’s a rough time for supply and on top of that Intel’s been suffering 14nm shortages for what seems like years now. Then there’s the unlocked 10900K that thanks to a higher 125 watt TDP rating, it clocks no lower than 3.7 GHz with a max turbo boost of 5.2 GHz.Unfortunately, right now many of these 10th-gen Core processors are either out of stock or are selling well over the MSRP. The 10900 is the base model and as a 65-watt part it features a rather low 2.8 GHz base frequency with a 5.1 GHz turbo. There are four models, two of which are F variants.

Then we see a 13% jump from the 10400 to the 10600K and this difference is a result of the operating clock speed, and of course, given that the K SKU part is unlocked, that margin can be increased further by overclocking.Then we see an almost 40% increase when going from the 10600K to the 10700K and of course that’s largely due to a 33% increase in core count, with the rest clock speed related as the i7 processor clocks around 6% higher. BenchmarksStarting with Cinebench R20 we find that the 10400 is just shy of 50% faster than the 10100, which makes sense given the i5 processor packs 50% more cores and clock speeds are about the same. As usual we’re also relying on an RTX 2080 Ti to alleviate potential GPU bottlenecks, allowing us to take a better look at the actual CPU performance.

For example, we see a 25% increase when going from the 10100 to the 10400, and a 16% increase from the 10700K to the 10900K.Adobe Photoshop mostly relies on single core performance, and for that same reason we didn’t expect to see a 47% performance increase from the Core i3-10100 to the Core i9-10900K. Interestingly, we do see a reasonable boost in performance to the 10700K, but then only a very small step up to the 10900K, suggesting that 8 cores/16 threads is the sweet spot for this application.Scaling is more consistent in Adobe Premiere Pro, where we see fairly consistent performance gains as the core count increases. The 10400 was just 15% faster, while the 10600K was just a few percent faster than the locked i5 model. Here the Core i3-10100 fairs quite well, at least for the editing portion of the job. From the 10600K to the 10700K you’re again looking at a 30% performance increase and then another 30% to the 10900K.The margins are less predictable for video production work. We’re looking at a 50% performance uplift when going from the 10100 to the 10400.

Intel Core I3 Vs I5 1080P With The

Meanwhile the 10700K pushed system consumption just 30 watts higher than the 10600K.Time for a look at gaming performance and first up we have Battlefield V at 1080p with the ultra quality preset using an RTX 2080 Ti. Power ConsumptionThe Core i9-10900K is a beast, pushing total system consumption to 300 watts, a 70 watt increase from the 10700K. It’s interesting to see the 10600K and 10700K producing the same score, while the 10900K is around 13% faster, this is clearly a result of higher sustained frequencies. The 10900K is 35% faster than the 10100, though the 10700K and 10600K are just 20% faster.

However, by increasing the resolution to 1440p for a more realistic test scenario, we find very little difference in performance between the 10400, 10600K, 10700K and 10900K. The 10600K also managed to produce the same average frame rate but slipped away from the 1% low, trailing by an 8% margin.We see a further 6% decline in performance with the 10400 and then a rather large 22% drop off with the 10100.